Smoking Weed Is NOT Like Smoking Cigarettes

Nicholas Demski March 28, 2019 2 comments

We have so much science that now debunks the anti-drug ads we were raised up on.

Let’s dispose of the idea that there is any equivalency between smoking weed and cigarettes. These are not the same.

First of all, cigarettes stink. Even if you smoke cigarettes, you know they smell bad. And, sadly, your clothes and skin probably do as well. Cannabis, on the other hand, smells delicious. Not only that, it has a unique bouquet of aromatic delights depending on the cultivar and its terpene profile.

Smell is only one way that cigarettes and cannabis part ways. Here are six more important ways in which they differ.

There are no Dangerous Chemicals in Cannabis

When someone is smoking cannabis, ideally they’re smoking nothing but cannabis. This means without pesticides, herbicides, or any other potentially dangerous compounds; just a clean stash of cannabis flower. By contrast, the best case scenario for a cigarette smoker is a product filled with cancer-causing chemicals like butane, cadmium, ammonia, tar, acetone, hydrogen cyanide, and you get the idea. That’s why cigarette packages have warnings for the development of serious, life-limiting disease.

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=25]

cigarettes, packaging, chemicals, cannabis, medical cannabis, health risks, health benefits, toxins, tobacco

Cigarettes are a Known Carcinogen

The link between cigarettes and cancer is undeniably powerful. According to research from 2013, “smoking [cigarettes] has a multidimensional impact on lung cancer.”

A 2017 study that appeared in Scientific Reports was more specific in its analysis. According to researchers the epidemiological evidence is already overwhelming so their study focused on pinning down how cigarette smoke causes cancer.

They demonstrated that cigarette smoking “causes prominent alterations in DNA enriched in numerous genes and biologically meaningful pathways implicated in cancer pathology”. In other words, cigarette smoking is extremely carcinogenic because it leads to mutations in your DNA.

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=26]

Cannabis, on the other hand, is less defined. While there is a possibility that certain forms of consumption (ie. smoking joints and blunts) have carcinogenic properties, there’s also increasing scientific proof that cannabis and its cannabinoids may shrink tumors. The hard truth is that there is no safe level of longterm exposure to the products of combustion but maybe cannabinoids mitigate that risk.

RELATED  Is Cannabis Going to be a Future Colorectal Cancer Treatment?

Long-term Studies on Pulmonary Changes

It’s important to compare smoking weed to cigarette smoking in terms of their long-term effects. According to research that appeared in JAMA in 2012, “occasional and low cumulative marijuana use was not associated with adverse effects on pulmonary function,” but they could not yet conclude the same for people who smoked weed heavily.

They collected data over 20 years of research along with hard evidence that cigarette smoke causes significant damage to smokers’ lungs and pulmonary functions. This is hardly a surprise – there’s a reason that “smoker’s cough” is a common term. On the other end of the spectrum, THC is a powerful bronchodilator and has even been known to improve lung function.

cigarettes, packaging, chemicals, cannabis, medical cannabis, health risks, health benefits, toxins, tobacco, bongs, filters, cancer

You Still Need a Filter No Matter What You Smoke

Filtration matters. Cigarettes have their filters, but these can hardly block out all the toxic chemicals from entering a smoker’s lungs. Of course, the existence of a filter is better than none.  These days, when smoking cannabis, there are so many more options.

The good news for smoking cannabis is that we are no longer in the days where you have to smoke a joint through a cardboard roach.

For example, the most well-designed bongs will run cannabis smoke through a series of filters that each have their own purpose. The first filtration could be a percolated down stem. The multiple exits for the cannabis smoke break it apart and open the space between the molecules. As it exits the down stem, the smoke creates smaller bubbles. The reservoir of water filters and cools these bubbles. Next, the smoke moves up into multiple tubes that again cool the smoke before they pass through an ice trap that drops its temperature even further.

All combusted biomaterials are carcinogenic. Still, a filter minimizes the risk. The wide range of cannabis vaporizers, nebulizers, and bongs that are now available provide options to lessen exposure to any carcinogenic compounds.

RELATED  Air Pollution Harming Every Organ In Your Body

a cigarette, filter first

Smoking Cigarettes is More Frequent Exposure to Hot Smoke

Perhaps just as pertinent as the filtration system is the habit. Compare people smoking weed to people smoking cigarettes. How many puffs do cannabis smokers take? How about cigarette smokers? It’s obvious that cigarette smokers take more puffs per day. A pack of 20 cigarettes with a dozen puffs a piece versus a few small bowls, likely less than 6 puffs each of cannabis. This creates a large difference in a 24-hour time period.

Next, extrapolate those numbers to the timescale of years or decades. Now it becomes clear why the cigarette habit is much harsher on the lungs and airways than smoking weed.

Nicotine Addiction

Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, is that cigarettes are extremely addictive. The nicotine in cigarettes makes them one of the hardest products on the market to quit once addiction sets in. There are stats to indicate that 9% of cannabis smokers become psychologically addicted, but it’s still being investigated. There are no physical withdrawals from quitting cannabis.

So, the next time someone tells you that smoking cannabis is just as bad as smoking cigarettes, you’ve got six reasons to call them out on that lie.

Author avatar

Nicholas Demski

I like to smash stigmas of all types. I'm a full-time single father, world-traveler, and an advocate for medicinal plants being treated for what they are: plants. You can follow my life's journey on the following platforms: Instagram @TheSingleDadNomad YouTube and Facebook: The Single Dad Nomad Blog: www.TheSingleDadNomad.com Also, feel free to have a look at my portfolio of work: nicholasdemski.contently.com

2 comments

  1. This article is not fact based but written by someone with an agenda.
    Cannabus does smell bad in heavy users when on the clothes, as any burnt substances do.
    The author says cannabus is safe but why the need for filters at all then?
    An yes nicotine is very addictive but Cannabus users have the same addiction to its use.
    And now vaping, which was touted as the ultra safe way to use, is now cancer causing.
    And now more accidents are occurring while driving under the influence especially in the younger generation.
    For some reason people demonize drunk drivers on alcohol but think it is ok to drive while under the influence of cannabus.

    • Jennifer Grant

      I would be shocked if anyone approved of driving under any conditions except stone-cold sober. The issue with field sobriety test is that the current technology can only check for presence of THC (which can be measured up to 28 days after consumption and therefor is not measure of sobriety). The rest…there are many studies out there to prove the exact opposite of everything you’ve listed here, Marty. The filter is to prevent bits of weed from getting in your mouth. It’s not able to filter any smoke. Vaping is not cancer-causing but there DOES appear to be some sort of life-threatening issue with fake cartridges. Addiction? Cannabis has a lifetime risk if 9% to 12% when consumed chronically (indicated as daily use) and for nicotine – 49% have addiction issues by the time they are smoking one day per week. States that have legalized actually have lowered cannabis usage for youth and LESS traffic fatalities. So, I’m super glad you found this article to help you on your way to understanding the truth about cannabis.